I think Juan Enriquez may be my new favorite futurist, right up there with Ray Kurzweil and Victor Vinge. Just when all the economy crushing news of the past few months had begun to tarnish my hopes of a techno-utopian paradise before this century’s midpoint, Enriquez has restored my hope that radical technological progress may indeed save us from a hellish voyage into a post-industrial society.
Enriquez gave a talk at this years TED conference titled Tech evolution will eclipse the financial crisis. (YouTube, about 20 minutes.) He starts out by reviewing the financial crisis, touching on bank over-leveraging, the growing deficit, and budget cuts necessary to keep the doom at bay, then, after building up the the dire importance of our current situation, tells us that everything will be okay because technology will save us all. (Further coverage here)
One of the changes he says is needed to stave off disaster is an increase in the retirement age: one year for anyone 60-65, two years for the 50-60, crowd, and an additional 4 years for anyone under 50. The reason for this, he states, is that when Social Security was created the average life span was only 3 or 5 years past retirement age. Medical technology has significantly increased our life span and has put a burden on the SS war chest. It’s time to make appropriate changes. Other recommendations he suggests include a cap on medical spending, a 3% cut in military spending , selective budget cuts, limits on deficit spending and, smaller government in general.
He then continues on to say that as big a wave as this current crisis, there is an even larger wave looming over the top of it called technology. He uses this picture to make his point:

As a quick introduction let me describe what Kurzweil calls the GNR revolution, a period when overlapping advances in genetics, nanotechnology, and robotics ushers in a new epoch of human evolution. A favorite Kurzweil quote of mine is that “humans are the first species to create their successor.” I paraphrase as I can’t find the exact quote; the idea is that as our technology has advanced we have gained the ability to direct the evolution of homo sapien towards a point greater than our current ability. Kurzweil belives that this self-directed evolution will culminate in superhuman intelligence, mind uploading and control of the physical environment through nanoswarms. Enriquez is a bit more down to Earth and is much more persuasive to the skeptic with examples of current scientific advances being performed in grad schools around the country today.
The examples Enriquez gives come from the realms of gene modification, tissue engineering, and robotics. Advances in which regular skin cells can be reprogrammed to grow into any organ in the body, which are being performed to day to regrow ears, windpipes and teeth; advances in hearing aid technology that will soon grant superhuman hearing, followed by similar advancements in eyesight restoration; robotic pack animals that can carry hundreds of pounds of gear over hilly terrain; these are just a few of the examples he says will carry us to the next version of the human species, homo evolutis.
Last month my fiancee went from being blind without her eyeglasses to having 20/15 vision after a thousand dollar operation that took less than an hour. I’ve told her in the past that once they have a version of the internet that you can plug directly into your head I’ll be the first to sign up. While I might joke about her ‘augmentation’ now, I’m deadly serious about predictions of the world we’ll be facing in the next 20 years. While many naysayers like to get down on those like myself who dream of a ‘nerd rapture’ which promises to keep our bodies and minds strong for hundreds of years, I think that the words of men like Enriquez and Kurzweil hold much promise for the future. Kurweil points out that people tend to overestimate what we can accomplish in the short term and underestimate what we can accomplish in the long term. A lot of people fail to factor in the exponential increase in technological innovation, or change, over time to thier worldview, and these people will be in for a large case of future shock soon.
Of course all this depends on whether or not we can build a human level artificial intelligence before we succumb to oil depletion, drought or other eco-disaster. My money’s on Moore’s Law holding out long enough for us to get there.